王 琰1 史 枫2
（1.北京开放大学 教务处，北京 100081；2.北京教育科学研究院 终身学习与可持续发展教育研究所，北京 100036）
【摘 要】本文以1999年至2025年北京学习型城市建设相关政策文本为研究对象，基于政策工具理论构建“工具—领域—时间”三维分析框架，对38份政策文本和405个有效编码单元进行内容分析。研究发现，北京学习型城市建设政策总体呈现环境型工具主导、供给型工具支撑、需求型工具相对上升的结构性特征；政策领域以社区教育与学习型城区/社区、终身教育体系建设为核心，并逐步拓展至老年教育、学分银行、学习成果认证转换和公共文化教育等领域；政策演进经历了探索启动、体系构建、项目推进和高质量融合四个阶段，体现出从基层组织创建到城市整体治理、从资源供给到机制创新、从行政动员到学习生态构建的演进逻辑。未来，应进一步优化政策工具组合，强化终身学习资源整合，提升数字治理能力，完善学习成果认证转换机制，推动学习型城市建设由体系完善迈向效能提升，为建设全民终身学习的学习型社会提供首都经验。
【关键词】学习型城市；政策工具；终身教育
The Evolutionary Logic and Future Trends of Beijing’s Learning City Development Policy from the Perspective of Policy Tools
WANG Yan1 and SHI Feng2
(1. Academic Affairs Office, Beijing Open University, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Beijing Academy of Educational Sciences, Beijing 100036, China)
Abstract: Taking the policy texts related to the construction of a learning city in Beijing from 1999 to 2025 as the research object, this study constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of “instrument–domain–time” based on the theory of policy instruments, and conducts a content analysis of 38 policy texts and 405 valid coding units. The research finds that Beijing’s learning city construction policies generally exhibit structural characteristics dominated by environmental instruments, supported by supply-side instruments, and accompanied by a relative rise in demand-side instruments. In terms of policy domains, community education and learning-oriented districts/communities, along with the construction of the lifelong education system, form the core, and have gradually expanded to areas such as elderly education, credit banks, the accreditation and transfer of learning outcomes, and public cultural education. The policy evolution has gone through four stages: exploration and initiation, system construction, project advancement, and high-quality integration,reflecting an evolutionary logic that moves from grassroots organizational creation to overall urban governance, from resource supply to institutional innovation, and from administrative mobilization to the construction of a learning ecosystem. In the future, it is necessary to further optimize the mix of policy instruments, strengthen the integration of lifelong learning resources, enhance digital governance capabilities, improve the mechanisms for accrediting and transferring learning outcomes, and promote the construction of the learning city from system perfection to efficiency enhancement, so as to provide the capital’s experience for building a learning society with lifelong learning for all.
Keywords: learning city; policy instruments; lifelong education
下载： 
政策工具视角下北京学习型城市建设政策的演进逻辑与趋势展望.pdf
